Lines Matching refs:instructions
93 It's the maximum number of instructions that the unprivileged bpf
95 Like the maximum number of instructions that can be explored during
98 of 1 million NOP instructions. There is a limit to the maximum number
119 Q: LD_ABS and LD_IND instructions vs C code
129 Q: BPF instructions mapping not one-to-one to native CPU
131 Q: It seems not all BPF instructions are one-to-one to native CPU.
154 of LD_ABS insn). Those instructions need to invoke epilogue and
157 Q: Why BPF_JLT and BPF_JLE instructions were not introduced in the beginning?
161 due to lack of these compare instructions and they were added.
162 These two instructions is a perfect example what kind of new BPF
163 instructions are acceptable and can be added in the future.
164 These two already had equivalent instructions in native CPUs.
165 New instructions that don't have one-to-one mapping to HW instructions
181 Starting with version 7, LLVM is able to generate instructions that operate
184 instructions for which zero-ing the upper bits of the destination register
188 subregisters written by alu32 instructions or narrow loads. Instead, the
195 it could lead to the insertion of unnecessary zext instructions. Such
196 instructions could be removed by creating a simple peephole inside the JIT
203 A: YES. BPF instructions, arguments to BPF programs, set of helper
239 A: NO. Classic BPF programs are converted into extend BPF instructions.