Searched refs:has_found_new_command (Results 1 – 2 of 2) sorted by relevance
44 bool has_found_new_command = false; in TEST() local54 EXPECT_FALSE(has_found_new_command); in TEST()55 has_found_new_command = true; in TEST()59 EXPECT_TRUE(has_found_new_command); in TEST()63 has_found_new_command = false; in TEST()73 EXPECT_FALSE(has_found_new_command); in TEST()74 has_found_new_command = true; in TEST()78 EXPECT_TRUE(has_found_new_command); in TEST()
102 bool has_found_new_command = false; in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST() local114 TF_LITE_MICRO_EXPECT(!has_found_new_command); in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()115 has_found_new_command = true; in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()119 TF_LITE_MICRO_EXPECT(has_found_new_command); in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()120 if (has_found_new_command) { in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()128 has_found_new_command = false; in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()140 TF_LITE_MICRO_EXPECT(!has_found_new_command); in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()141 has_found_new_command = true; in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()145 TF_LITE_MICRO_EXPECT(has_found_new_command); in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()146 if (has_found_new_command) { in TF_LITE_MICRO_TEST()
Completed in 3 milliseconds