Searched refs:execlist (Results 1 – 7 of 7) sorted by relevance
67 execlist->running_slot ? in switch_virtual_execlist_slot()69 execlist->running_context ? in switch_virtual_execlist_slot()71 execlist->pending_slot ? in switch_virtual_execlist_slot()74 execlist->running_slot = execlist->pending_slot; in switch_virtual_execlist_slot()76 execlist->running_context = execlist->running_context ? in switch_virtual_execlist_slot()80 execlist->running_slot ? in switch_virtual_execlist_slot()84 execlist->pending_slot ? in switch_virtual_execlist_slot()460 struct intel_vgpu_execlist *execlist = &s->execlist[engine->id]; in intel_vgpu_submit_execlist() local504 struct intel_vgpu_execlist *execlist = &s->execlist[engine->id]; in init_vgpu_execlist() local508 memset(execlist, 0, sizeof(*execlist)); in init_vgpu_execlist()[all …]
11 gvt/execlist.o \
1970 struct intel_vgpu_execlist *execlist; in elsp_mmio_write() local1992 execlist = &vgpu->submission.execlist[engine->id]; in elsp_mmio_write()1994 execlist->elsp_dwords.data[3 - execlist->elsp_dwords.index] = data; in elsp_mmio_write()1995 if (execlist->elsp_dwords.index == 3) { in elsp_mmio_write()2002 ++execlist->elsp_dwords.index; in elsp_mmio_write()2003 execlist->elsp_dwords.index &= 0x3; in elsp_mmio_write()
150 struct intel_vgpu_execlist execlist[I915_NUM_ENGINES]; member
114 struct i915_request_coredump execlist[EXECLIST_MAX_PORTS]; member
598 error_print_request(m, " ", &ee->execlist[n]); in error_print_engine()1367 record_request(*port++, &ee->execlist[n++]); in engine_record_execlists()
48 execlist. Hence, no support for implicit sync. It is expected that the below95 The locking design here supports the older (execlist based) execbuf mode, the
Completed in 22 milliseconds