| /linux/scripts/kconfig/tests/err_recursive_dep/ |
| A D | expected_stderr | 1 error: recursive dependency detected!
4 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
6 error: recursive dependency detected!
9 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
11 error: recursive dependency detected!
15 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
17 error: recursive dependency detected!
21 subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
23 error: recursive dependency detected!
29 error: recursive dependency detected!
[all …]
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/ |
| A D | amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence.c | 34 struct dma_fence *dependency; member
56 if (f->dependency) { in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
57 dma_fence_wait(f->dependency, false); in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
58 dma_fence_put(f->dependency); in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
59 f->dependency = NULL; in amdgpu_tlb_fence_work()
99 f->dependency = *fence; in amdgpu_vm_tlb_fence_create()
|
| /linux/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/ |
| A D | sched_entity.c | 161 if (READ_ONCE(entity->dependency)) in drm_sched_entity_is_ready()
338 if (entity->dependency) { in drm_sched_entity_fini()
340 dma_fence_put(entity->dependency); in drm_sched_entity_fini()
341 entity->dependency = NULL; in drm_sched_entity_fini()
370 entity->dependency = NULL; in drm_sched_entity_clear_dep()
412 struct dma_fence *fence = entity->dependency; in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
422 dma_fence_put(entity->dependency); in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
435 dma_fence_put(entity->dependency); in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
436 entity->dependency = fence; in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
450 dma_fence_put(entity->dependency); in drm_sched_entity_add_dependency_cb()
[all …]
|
| /linux/Documentation/kbuild/ |
| A D | Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 | 8 # This Kconfig file has a simple recursive dependency issue. In order to
9 # understand why this recursive dependency issue occurs lets consider what
34 # the "recursive dependency detected" error.
39 # since CORE_BELL_A depends on CORE. Recursive dependency issues are not always
42 # easy to understand. Note that matching semantics on the dependency on
45 mainmenu "Simple example to demo kconfig recursive dependency issue"
|
| A D | kconfig-language.rst | 123 This defines a dependency for this menu entry. If multiple
167 from a direct dependency or with a visible prompt.
208 FOO should imply not only BAZ, but also its dependency BAR::
311 dependency list of the config option NETDEVICES.
316 be part of the dependency list and then one of these two conditions
550 the dependency is not met.
590 This means that there is either a dependency on BAR that disallows
593 the same dependency, a helper symbol can be used, like::
602 Kconfig recursive dependency limitations
606 into a recursive dependency issue with Kconfig, a recursive dependency can be
[all …]
|
| A D | Kconfig.select-break | 1 # Select broken dependency issue
21 mainmenu "Simple example to demo kconfig select broken dependency issue"
|
| /linux/include/trace/events/ |
| A D | timer.h | 428 TP_PROTO(int success, int dependency),
430 TP_ARGS(success, dependency),
434 __field( int , dependency )
439 __entry->dependency = dependency;
443 show_tick_dep_name(__entry->dependency))
|
| /linux/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ |
| A D | LB+fencembonceonce+ctrlonceonce.litmus | 9 * combination of a control dependency and a full memory barrier are enough
11 * another control dependency and order would still be maintained.)
|
| A D | dep+plain.litmus | 10 * conditional of P0()'s if-statement creates a control dependency
|
| /linux/tools/memory-model/Documentation/ |
| A D | control-dependencies.txt | 12 Therefore, a load-load control dependency will not preserve ordering
46 the control dependency.
103 Without explicit memory ordering, control-dependency-based ordering is
161 "if" statement, destroying the control dependency's ordering properties.
172 destroying the control dependency's ordering:
210 ordered CPU would have no dependency of any sort between the load from
232 destroy the control dependency while respecting the letter of the
243 dependency into nonexistence. Careful use of READ_ONCE() or
244 atomic{,64}_read() can help to preserve your control dependency.
247 of the "if" statement containing the control dependency, including
|
| A D | glossary.txt | 9 dependency" extends from that load extending to the later access.
20 address dependency extends from that rcu_dereference() to that
56 a "control dependency" extends from that load to that store.
62 Here, the control dependency extends from the READ_ONCE() on
89 on the value returned by an earlier load, a "data dependency"
95 In this case, the data dependency extends from the READ_ONCE()
100 especially true in cases where the dependency is carried through
|
| A D | cheatsheet.txt | 31 DR: Dependent read (address dependency)
32 DW: Dependent write (address, data, or control dependency)
|
| A D | recipes.txt | 274 against later accesses that depend on the value loaded. A dependency
276 (address dependency, as shown above), the value written by a later store
277 (data dependency), or whether or not a later store is executed in the
278 first place (control dependency). Note that the term "data dependency"
361 control dependency paired with a full memory barrier:
378 This pairing of a control dependency in CPU0() with a full memory
384 control dependency on the kernel side and a full memory barrier on
398 The kernel's control dependency between the load from ->data_tail
555 the LB litmus test, a control dependency was enough to do the
|
| /linux/Documentation/locking/ |
| A D | lockdep-design.rst | 22 dependency can be understood as lock order, where L1 -> L2 suggests that
25 dependency just means the order ever happened. The validator maintains a
137 Multi-lock dependency rules:
151 validator will find such dependency circle in arbitrary complexity,
173 dependency rules are enforced:
512 Dependency types and strong dependency paths:
519 For each lock dependency::
565 , we have both X -(SN)-> Y and X -(EN)-> Y in the dependency graph.
571 "strong" path, which indicates the strong dependency throughout each dependency
577 -(SR)-> dependency.
[all …]
|
| /linux/Documentation/core-api/ |
| A D | refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 64 A control dependency (on success) for refcounters guarantees that
68 Control dependency on stores are not implemented using any explicit
123 * fully ordered --> control dependency on success for stores
152 * fully ordered --> RELEASE ordering + control dependency
167 * fully ordered --> RELEASE ordering + control dependency + hold
|
| /linux/scripts/ |
| A D | dev-needs.sh | 14 /sys/devices and then lists the probe dependency chain (suppliers and
15 parents) of these devices. It does a breadth first search of the dependency
17 dependency chain.
|
| /linux/Documentation/ |
| A D | memory-barriers.txt | 422 the address-dependency barrier.
440 address-dependency barriers.
574 address-dependency barriers.
694 /* BUG: No address dependency!!! */
699 dependency, but rather a control dependency that the CPU may short-circuit
845 defeating control dependency:
928 control dependency.
949 with an address-dependency barrier, a control dependency, an acquire barrier,
951 read barrier, control dependency, or an address-dependency barrier pairs
1100 <address-dependency barrier>
[all …]
|
| /linux/Documentation/driver-api/memory-devices/ |
| A D | ti-gpmc.rst | 28 dependency for certain gpmc timings on gpmc clock frequency. Hence a
54 gpmc timing dependency on peripheral timings:
175 indirect dependency of peripheral timings to gpmc timings other than
|
| /linux/Documentation/driver-api/ |
| A D | device_link.rst | 21 Often these two dependency types come together, so a device depends on
27 In its standard or *managed* form, a device link combines *both* dependency
60 represents a driver presence dependency, yet is added from the consumer's
82 driver presence dependency is needed (but only correct suspend/resume and
109 Driver authors should be aware that a driver presence dependency for managed
178 (supplier). A driver presence dependency is not necessary for this
194 * In some SoCs a functional dependency exists from display, video codec and
208 ordering or a driver presence dependency.
235 To prevent introduction of dependency loops into the graph, it is
246 such a device link only makes sense if a driver presence dependency is
|
| /linux/drivers/clk/zynqmp/ |
| A D | Kconfig | 9 It has a dependency on the PMU firmware.
|
| /linux/Documentation/networking/ |
| A D | tcp-thin.rst | 15 dependency on the arrival of new data from the application to trigger
22 lifespan. The combination of time-dependency and the fact that the
|
| /linux/kernel/bpf/preload/ |
| A D | Kconfig | 10 # The dependency on !COMPILE_TEST prevents it from being enabled
|
| /linux/drivers/mtd/lpddr/ |
| A D | Kconfig | 23 # ARM dependency is only for writel_relaxed()
|
| /linux/tools/build/ |
| A D | Build.include | 59 # Copy dependency data into .cmd file
60 # - gcc -M dependency info
|
| /linux/Documentation/crypto/ |
| A D | async-tx-api.rst | 53 2. cross channel dependency chains: the API allows a chain of dependent
99 before the dependency is submitted. This requires that all descriptors be
105 2. submitting an unacknowledged descriptor as a dependency to another
128 it polls for the completion of the operation. It handles dependency
|